Skip to main content

HISTORICAL STEP TAKEN IN THE EU-BREXIT NEGOTIATIONS



Theresa May has signed the letter that will formally begin the UK's departure from the European Union.

Giving official notice under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, it will be delivered to European Council president Donald Tusk later.

The first step has legally been accomplished, however, Article 50 gives both sides two years to reach agreement, so unless both sides agree to extend the deadline, the UK will leave on 29 March 2019.

As a result of Brexit, the UK will withdraw from the single market, which means in turn, the UK will start a new negotiation stage for the purposes to sign a trade agreement with the EU.

From the legal point of me, the UK should prepare a Brexit bill, which shall detail the obligations of the UK to leave the EU. Also, the UK will leave the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Therefore, mostly, trade disputes should be set up under a different mechanism which is still subject to discussions. 

Apparently, upon the conclusion of Brexit, the legal instruments of the EU, for instance, the Brussels regulations in commercial and civil matters (Brussels regulations) and the others shall not be applicable to the UK anymore, in other words, no any legal instrument shall be applicable in the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice, in which the free movement of goods, services, persons, capitals are involved within the territory of the EU. 

Taking into consideration the above mentioned issues, the UK should be provided with a transitional deal for interim arrangements as well, however, when and what kind of an arrangement is going to be introduced ? This question is still open.

On this thursday the UK is expected to publish details of its "Great Repeal Bill", which aims to convert EU law into domestic legislation and repeal the European Communities Act, which says EU law is supreme to the UK's. 

Having said the above mentioned matters, the Brexit question also draws an interest at WTO nowadays. WTO members are interested in its agriculture tariff system and preferential trade scheme for poorer countries after the UK leaves the EU. This question is also open,but, the UK is treated by WTO as a member state of the EU for now. Nevertheless, while the Brexit procedure is being negotiated, this question should be clarified in due course too.

It is not news that, upon the Brexit, the UK should prepare its own trade schedules, which means the UK shall not use the collective trade schedules of the EU.

Considering the historical trends and trade-related aspects in Europe, to create its own trade schedules would mean copying and pasting from the EU. But, agricultural tariffs and subsidies cannot simply be copied from the EU: Because, the UK needs to get the agreement of the 164-member states of WTO on subsidies, its farmers and how many tonnes of agricultural commodities such as beef or wheat it will import at a low tariff.

The other most speculated issue is about the relations of the UK and the other non-EU states in the European continent, for example, Switzerland.

According to Henri Getaz, the Swiss diplomat in charge of Brexit negotiations for his country, said at the end of January that Switzerland regarded the negotiation of Britain's new schedules as a potential win-win, but other countries might not.

Does Switzerland speculate post-Brexit aliance with the UK against the EU? Analyzing the historical and current relations between Switzerland and the EU, there is no any reason to do this. Most probably, the UK shall follow the model of the EU-Switzerland which is farmed by a series of bilateral treaties where the Swiss Confederation has adopted various provisions of EU law in order to be a part of the Union's single market. Hopefully, the two states shall work together to negotiate the favorable terms of access to the single market within the EU.

Thus, by remembering this day as an important historical date in the EU legal community, lets follow the next steps in the EU-Brexit negotiations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Corporate Governance System of Azerbaijan

Corporate Governance System of Azerbaijan Summary  Corporate governance is the system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. Corporate governance involves balancing the interests of a company's stakeholders, such as shareholders, senior management executives, customers, suppliers, government.  How the corporate governance system in Azerbaijan is directed and controlled ? What are advantages and disadvantages of the corporate governance systems ? Facets in Corporate Governance system of Azerbaijan It is well known that there are two main set of rules on the supervision of corporate governance; one-tier boards and two-tier boards. In the one-tier board system not only the management of companies, but its control (supervision) of directors of companies lies in the hands of a management, it is an additional task for the board itself, by contrast, in the two-tier system the control (supervision) of directors of companies ...

INTERACTION (my reply to the reader's letter)

I have recently received the below mentioned letter on the article   (the contractual aspects of Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy)  written previously by me.  First of all, let me express my gratitude that you have read and spent countless hours by analyzing this article. It is very delightful to receive such an analyzed opinion for this issue. Please be ensured that the confidentiality of this letter shall be observed and the letter is being published in an original copy:  Здравствуйте, Тогрул Пишет вам постоянная читательница вашего блога. Нет, я совершенно не разбираюсь в юриспруденции, я вообще блондинка, причем, это не метафора, а реальный оттенок моих волос. Ну, как реальный, крашеная… Зачем я все это вам рассказываю? : D  Итак, я искала информацию по брекзиту, а набрела на такой интересный анализ, с тех пор периодически проверяю вашу страницу на наличие обновлений.   Надо сказать, что пока я читала роман «Пятьдесят оттенков серого», я под...

ROLE OF PRINCIPLE OF PARTY AUTONOMY IN ARBITRATION

Summary The principle of party autonomy plays a significant role in arbitration. By applying this principle parties decide on provisions of a contract, applicable law and the other. But, can the principle of party autonomy be limited? Can the scope of the principle be extended to arbitral tribunal when parties make no choice of law? Does arbitral tribunal have a power to decide on an applicable law? These issues are very crucial in arbitration. Principle of Party Autonomy By applying this principle parties agree on the provisions of a contract; rights and obligations of parties, performance form of the contract etc. It is not always possible to predict the right intention of parties. Therefore, arbitral tribunal, most of the time, refer to the provisions of applicable law chosen by parties. According to this principle, the parties are free to make their own contract and choose an applicable law.      However, in the absent of choice by parties, does a...